I would like to dedicate
this post to my N'toroma Kelly Barb, aka Kadiatou Camara.
As a volunteer, I have a
lot of free time on my hands. Time to read, to think, to nap, and
even time to write ridiculous blog posts dedicated to questions
people have asked me. One day, a fellow volunteer posed the doozy:
Why did Guineans so quickly adopt the cellphone yet still consider
spoons to be taboo? It was a good question. Guinea hasn't adopted
many modern technologies, but in less than 10 years, cell phones have
become ubiquitous. Yet spoons, which have been around hundreds,
maybe even thousands of years, are something that have not been
universally adopted! The question was there and while I had some
theories, I quickly forgot about it. Several weeks later, I came
across a similar question in Jared Diamond's Guns, Germs and
Steel. The book studies the question “why was it that Europeans who conquered the world and not any other group of people?” Nestled
inside its 400+ pages was a discussion about why or why not a society
might accept new technology.
When something new is
invented, no matter what and no matter where, society has to be
persuaded to use it. Will the invention drastically change their
lives? Will it save them time? Will it make them money? Obviously
some societies are more open to change than others, but no matter
the society, Diamond gives 4 criteria for the successful integration
of new technology
- relative economic advantage compared with existing technology
- social value and prestige
- compatibility with vested interests
- ease with which their advantage can be observed
Now I realize this is
getting a little deep, but stick with me.
I'll start with cellphones.
This clever little gadget suddenly connected a country that never had
widespread phone lines, or even paved roads. Suddenly, people were connected with those who were a 24 hour drive away! It allowed someone to talk to
anyone, anywhere, anytime. It made life easier and (this is key) was immediately recognized and therefore became more likely to be adopted
by society. The cellphone hits 4/4 of Diamond's prerequisites (#2 –
The wealthier you are, the cooler your phone is) and most people
would agree adopting the cellphone was the obvious answer. So why not
the spoon?
What are the benefits of a
spoon? It keeps your hands clean, and it helps prevent the spread of
germs. Here we find our first problem. You can't see germs, and even
to this day people will laugh at you if you tell them germs make you
sick. Secondly, spoons don't offer an economic advantage over your
hands, which are already free and available 24/7. Introducing the
spoon introduced another cost to those who probably couldn't afford
it. 1 or 2 spoons wasn't enough. What about the myriad of children,
relatives and friends? Finally, spoons mean more dishes to wash and
who needs that? Water is scarce enough as it is, even with modern
pumps and wells. In my opinion, those who first tried spoons couldn't
tell that it made any positive, immediate, or noticeable impacts, or
if it did, it wasn't worth the price. Therefore, I argue that
Guineans weren't receptive to spoons because it was an unwelcome
technology whose advantage to this day has yet to be realized. In
contrast, cellphones solved a huge problem and were adopted with
relative ease.
So that is my answer.
Whether or not you find it acceptable or insane is for you to decide.
Hopefully, I didn't make it worse! And don't worry. Even though I can
understand their side, I am 100% PRO SPOON.
Spoons rule!
ReplyDeleteYou make a lot of sense! I'm giving up using spoons. Now I'll just have to wash my hands instead of all those spoons. Getting liquid stuff into my mouth just means that I'll have to sip from the bowl instead of the "gentile" method of spooning it up... not a big problem except for the looks of other people sitting nearby. What a relief!
ReplyDelete